Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Benjamin Hassan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Hassan analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Benjamin Hassan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carabelli 1 - 0 Hassan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 48.13% of points on their second serve, while Hassan has won 52.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 54.9% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hassan has won 49.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.3% and 28.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 61.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hassan has saved 62.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 66.25% of matches played (W/L 53/ 27), with Hassan winning 57.5% (W/L 46/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 291/ 161), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Hassan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 178/ 107), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.44% of matches (W/L 47/ 17), where as Hassan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 33/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carabelli winning 1 times and Hassan being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 2 and Hassan winning 1. The last match between Carabelli and Hassan was at the Meerbusch Challenger, 11-08-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 7-6(2) 1-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:22:54.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carabelli and Hassan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Carabelli winning 1 times and Hassan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Carabelli winning 1, and Hassan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.7 while Hassan has played against players with an average rank of 287.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hassan has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 46.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hassan has converted 40.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
100
Rank
96
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
154
Rank
143
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
63% (320-187)
Career Total W/L
60% (283-188)
65% (31-17)
YTD W/L
44% (16-20)
$130,440
Career Prize Money
$178,880
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Benjamin Hassan For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Carabelli VS Hassan
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Benjamin Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 6 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:22:54 | 2:22:54 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (59/89) | 50% (51/101) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (36/59) | 69% (35/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (17/30) | 56% (28/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 27% (3/11) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (38/101) | 40% (36/89) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 1-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Benjamin Hassan
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
50%
(
51 of
101)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
91
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Benjamin Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (31/17) | 44% (16/20) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (65/44) | 48% (41/45) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (573/502) | 50% (417/421) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 66% (29/15) | 55% (11/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 105 | 176 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 102 | 88 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:43 | 1:32:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 243.33 | 246.69 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (2216/3502) | 57% (1482/2578) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1481/2216) | 71% (1051/1482) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (619/1286) | 53% (576/1096) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (177/381) | 41% (76/187) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1474/3484) | 36% (893/2491) |
| Slam W/L | 40% (2/3) | 40% (2/3) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (3/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 76% (25/8) | 47% (8/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (29/46) | 44% (16/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (10/20) | 47% (8/17) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 36% (5/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 96% (27/26) | 71% (17/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 4% (27/1) | 29% (17/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 24% (21/5) | 21% (19/4) |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
67 of
97)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Gastao Elias
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
46%
(
49 of
106)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
47 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Benjamin Hassan
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
68 of
115)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
11
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
49 of
68)
71%
(
30 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
23 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
115)
113
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(8) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Benjamin Hassan
68%
(
78 of
114)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
114)
37
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
62 of
78)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
56 of
66)
69%
(
25 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
27 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
27 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(5) 6-7(7) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Benjamin Hassan
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Benjamin Hassan
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
56 of
121)
115
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(5) 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Rudolf Molleker
48%
(
43 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Benjamin Hassan
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
6 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
48
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Benjamin Hassan
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
118)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
58 of
76)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
26 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
41 of
118)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
47%
(
55 of
116)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
45 of
55)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
45 of
116)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Carabelli Vs Hassan Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Carabelli are available here and Hassan photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Benjamin Hassan
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
